Megatel Homes wrote:Please review the policy and previous post. To reiterate, yes, we allow the full inspection. Moreover, as outlined in the Policy, the 30-day requirement serves to ensure appropriate scheduling for Megatel, its contractors, its insurers, etc. Megatel exercises flexibility and appropriate accommodations for its customers.

Megatel Homes wrote:As we stated in our initial post:

"On behalf of Megatel Homes (“Megatel”), we would like to apologize for any confusion caused by the Clint Miller, Construction Manager, post. This post is not representative of Megatel’s Third-Party Inspection Policy (the “Policy”). ..."

We do also allow full inspection which includes access to roof, electrical panels and appliances, as outlined in our policy.

Again, we apologize for any confusion.

Megatel Homes wrote:P. Nathan, to the extent the statements set forth in the original email which triggered your slew of targeted attacked varies from the policy we posted, yes, we retract that statement (but also note that the builder had no authority to make such statements, and was not an authorized representative of the company). As you know, however, that the statement was retracted in our original response on the Home Inspector Forum, but you chose to ignore it. The Company’s policy was made available to you and the public at large. Furthermore, you’ll note in the Facebook thread that homeowners have come forward and stated that Megatel does indeed permit home inspections. We have no issue with third party home inspectors, and we encourage our valued customers to obtain them.

We have tried to contact you multiple times via phone and also via direct message on the Home Inspector Forum. You have not responded. Instead, you have chosen to cower behind baseless, false, and defamatory attacks on the company. Strangely, you have even gone so far as to pay to promote your statements. We’re not sure why you would spend your resources in such a manner, but we applaud you for your dedication to trolling one of the top home-builders in Texas. It appears, however, based on a cursory Google search, you have a history of such tactics. We wish you the best of luck in Indiana, a state in which we do not have a presence. Should we ever choose to build in Indiana, we thank you in advance for the advertising.

Megatel Homes wrote:P. Nathan, to the extent the statements set forth in the original email which triggered your slew of targeted attacked varies from the policy we posted, yes, we retract that statement (but also note that the builder had no authority to make such statements, and was not an authorized representative of the company). As you know, however, that the statement was retracted in our original response on the Home Inspector Forum, but you chose to ignore it. The Company’s policy was made available to you and the public at large. Furthermore, you’ll note in the Facebook thread that homeowners have come forward and stated that Megatel does indeed permit home inspections. We have no issue with third party home inspectors, and we encourage our valued customers to obtain them.

We have tried to contact you multiple times via phone and also via direct message on the Home Inspector Forum. You have not responded. Instead, you have chosen to cower behind baseless, false, and defamatory attacks on the company. Strangely, you have even gone so far as to pay to promote your statements. We’re not sure why you would spend your resources in such a manner, but we applaud you for your dedication to trolling one of the top home-builders in Texas. It appears, however, based on a cursory Google search, you have a history of such tactics. We wish you the best of luck in Indiana, a state in which we do not have a presence. Should we ever choose to build in Indiana, we thank you in advance for the advertising.

Megatel Homes wrote:This is P Nathan's reply on FB:

"You have tried to contact me and been on hold for less than 2 minutes and then hung up. Then on return call there is no answer."

To that we say: Your response is a blatant lie. We attempted to call your office twice. We left a message with your assistant. We never waited on hold. We have no record of your attempt to contact us, and if you did, please post proof of an outgoing call, and the time the call was made. Furthermore, we sent you a direct message with our contact information. You never responded. We would like to discuss this issue with you on the phone. We’re available today. Please provide us with a good contact number and time you are available.