<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Whirlpool Microwave Labels"]]></title>
		<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/list/26.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Whirlpool Microwave Labels"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ are rectangular with very small print and the model and serials are on opposite ends, making it very hard to capture both in a photo and still be legible.<br /> <br /> Problem:  1.6M recalled units bet I think 1998 to 2001.  The model # still exists, so they show a potential match, falsely alarming clients of newer units.<br /> <br /> Anyone come up with an easy work-around?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15770.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15770.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 13:50:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Pete Campbell]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Pete Campbell]are rectangular with very small print and the model and serials are on opposite ends, making it very hard to capture both in a photo and still be legible.<br /> <br /> Problem:  1.6M recalled units bet I think 1998 to 2001.  The model # still exists, so they show a potential match, falsely alarming clients of newer units.<br /> <br /> Anyone come up with an easy work-around?[/quote]<br /> <br /> In some cases like that, you may want to manually enter the model number and use the data plate pic for the serial or vice versa. <br /> <br /> Some manufacturers reuse the model numbers. The serial numbers have the date of manufacture coded somehow, which differentiate from one another. The RecallChek reports only require a model number, but both are helpful in some cases, such as this. <br /> <br /> It's helpful having the serial numbers for recalled dishwashers because they are the most recalled appliance, and most reports require them to confirm a recall or not.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15778.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15778.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 15:41:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bmwells62380]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I could be wrong, but I'm betting the team that enters this information has zoom/rotate/enhance capability on the photos you take through the RecallChek app (or with your camera in general) so the fine print on labels such as this shouldn't be a problem. That's my guess anyway, but maybe someone from the RecallChek side can chime in with something official.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15779.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15779.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 17:27:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kris Svendsen]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Kris Svendsen]I could be wrong, but I'm betting the team that enters this information has zoom/rotate/enhance capability on the photos you take through the RecallChek app (or with your camera in general) so the fine print on labels such as this shouldn't be a problem. That's my guess anyway, but maybe someone from the RecallChek side can chime in with something official.[/quote]<br /> <br /> We definitely have the capability to do exactly that! We can zoom in and out and rotate if we need to.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15780.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15780.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 17:30:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bmwells62380]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ That's exactly right. We have data entry personnel on 3 continents, all with insanely large screens capable of seeing the photos in their native resolution or better, and with multiple ways to manipulate a photo. <br /> <br /> We hardly ever miss one, and when we do there's a darn good reason. <br /> <br /> So go ahead- take your photos upside down, in bad light, or barely in focus!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15782.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15782.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 19:54:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nathan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Seems like my understanding has always been:  If the HI cannot read their pic the RC inputters cannot either.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15792.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15792.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 20:44:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Pete Campbell]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Whirlpool Microwave Labels</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Pete Campbell]Seems like my understanding has always been:  If the HI cannot read their pic the RC inputters cannot either.[/quote]<br /> <br /> That would certainly save us time, but we love a challenge!<br /> <br /> Yes, we prefer that and if the picture is completely gone we're not going to go CSI on it. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15793.page</guid>
				<link>https://the-forum.net/posts/preList/1700/15793.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2015 20:47:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nathan]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>